Just a quick aside: I was just noticing some examples of the common ANTZ practice of responding to justifiable ridicule (about anti-THR lies or their general tobacco prohibition campaigns) by suggesting the existence of criticism is evidence that their critics are wrong. It is the strangest thing, when you realize that this is what they are doing. They do not even try to argue with the critiques of their various absurdities and stupidities. They actually seem to think that the mere act of citing critiques is an argument in their favor. This is perhaps the simplest and most damning evidence that they are basically a religious cult, as well as the simpler fact that they live in an echo chamber.
You can find more of my sciences lessons at Patreon
My Patreon page is here. For just $1/month you can have access to that content and be able to participate in discussions. The modest donations help support the content here too.
And thanks again to those of you who have already done this.
- “Dependence” and the danger of adopting the language of your oppressors
- The folly of federalism for vaping (etc.) policy
- Fixed it for you – a Science Lesson based on a anti-vaping junk newspaper article
- Throwing “lifeboat ethics” thinking overboard
- Why is there anti-THR? (5) Needing an enemy and control for its own sake
Vaping In The News –… on “Dependence” and the danger of… Andrew Thompson (@va… on “Dependence” and the danger of… Robeto Sussman on “Dependence” and the danger of… Rhys on “Dependence” and the danger of… “Dependence” and the… on Smoking is not addictive
Follow this blogYou can subscribe using one of the usual methods. Posts will be announced in the primary author's Twitter: @carlvphillips.
Tags"no evidence" "passive vaping" 95% ACS addiction AHA ALA ANR ASH-UK Bates big picture biomarkers Burstyn carcinogens CDC censorship chemicals chiiiildren citations classic COI comparative risk conjunction CTFK demonic possession Dutra economics Ellen Hahn environmental vapor ERS ethics EU FCTC FDA fundamental lies gateway Glantz Gratziou gutka Hecht innumeracy Kelvin Choi Legacy logic meta-analysis motives MRTP non sequitur NRT NYTimes outsource particulates peer review policy recommendations Popova press release RCTs second-order preferences self policing Siegel statistiLie ST variants Swedish Match toxicology trANTZlator Trump parallels UAthens UBath UCSF UKY UMN US govt vapor chemistry WHO why anti-THR?