For those who read this blog but not the main CASAA blog, you might be interested in our assessment of the UK MHRA’s move to require that e-cigarettes be approved as medicines. You may find our analysis of what regulation by MHRA would look like to be somewhat more optimistic than what you might have read elsewhere. However, we are rather more concerned than some other commentators about its implications for the EU.
Please support this page by donating to my Patreon
My Patreon page is here. Please help me keep providing this public service. Becoming a patron also entitles you to premium science lesson content available only at that page.
And thanks again to those of you who have already done this.
Carl V Phillips on “Reason(s) you vape… rbnye on “Reason(s) you vape… Carl V Phillips on “Reason(s) you vape… H.W.Hilton (@halhilt… on “Reason(s) you vape… Vaping In The News –… on Tobacco Wars collateral damage…
Follow this blogYou can subscribe using one of the usual methods. Posts will be announced in the primary author's Twitter: @carlvphillips.
Tags"no evidence" "passive vaping" 95% ACS addiction AHA ALA ANR ASH-UK Bates big picture biomarkers Burstyn carcinogens CDC censorship chemicals chiiiildren citations classic COI comparative risk conjunction CTFK demonic possession Dutra economics Ellen Hahn environmental vapor ERS ethics EU FCTC FDA fundamental lies gateway Glantz Gratziou gutka Hecht innumeracy Kelvin Choi Legacy logic meta-analysis motives MRTP non sequitur NRT NYTimes outsource particulates peer review policy recommendations Popova press release RCTs second-order preferences self policing Siegel statistiLie ST variants Swedish Match toxicology trANTZlator Trump parallels UAthens UBath UCSF UKY UMN US govt vapor chemistry WHO why anti-THR?