Something about this post (the title and thus the URL, I guess) made it so half my readers could not access it. So I replaced it with an exact duplicate here. I am leaving this here as a placeholder for those who do navigate to it, but deleting the duplicate content.
You can find more of my sciences lessons at Patreon
My Patreon page is here. For just $1/month you can have access to that content and be able to participate in discussions. The modest donations help support the content here too.
And thanks again to those of you who have already done this.
- “Dependence” and the danger of adopting the language of your oppressors
- The folly of federalism for vaping (etc.) policy
- Fixed it for you – a Science Lesson based on a anti-vaping junk newspaper article
- Throwing “lifeboat ethics” thinking overboard
- Why is there anti-THR? (5) Needing an enemy and control for its own sake
michaeljmcfadden on Smoking is not addictive Carl V Phillips on “Dependence” and the danger of… Robert Lovelace on “Dependence” and the danger of… Carl V Phillips on “Dependence” and the danger of… Dnison Penndragon on “Dependence” and the danger of…
Follow this blogYou can subscribe using one of the usual methods. Posts will be announced in the primary author's Twitter: @carlvphillips.
Tags"no evidence" "passive vaping" 95% ACS addiction AHA ALA ANR ASH-UK Bates big picture biomarkers Burstyn carcinogens CDC censorship chemicals chiiiildren citations classic COI comparative risk conjunction CTFK demonic possession Dutra economics Ellen Hahn environmental vapor ERS ethics EU FCTC FDA fundamental lies gateway Glantz Gratziou gutka Hecht innumeracy Kelvin Choi Legacy logic meta-analysis motives MRTP non sequitur NRT NYTimes outsource particulates peer review policy recommendations Popova press release RCTs second-order preferences self policing Siegel statistiLie ST variants Swedish Match toxicology trANTZlator Trump parallels UAthens UBath UCSF UKY UMN US govt vapor chemistry WHO why anti-THR?