You can find more of my sciences lessons at Patreon
My Patreon page is here. For just $1/month you can have access to that content and be able to participate in discussions. The modest donations help support the content here too.
And thanks again to those of you who have already done this.
-
Recent Posts
- Can smoking protect you against COVID-19?
- New Glover-Phillips paper: “Potential effects of using non-combustible tobacco and nicotine products during pregnancy: a systematic review”
- “Dependence” and the danger of adopting the language of your oppressors
- The folly of federalism for vaping (etc.) policy
- Fixed it for you – a Science Lesson based on a anti-vaping junk newspaper article
Recent Comments
Carl V Phillips on Can smoking protect you agains… Carl V Phillips on Can smoking protect you agains… mobo392 on Can smoking protect you agains… Carl V Phillips on Can smoking protect you agains… Rose on Can smoking protect you agains… Follow this blog
You can subscribe using one of the usual methods. Posts will be announced in the primary author's Twitter: @carlvphillips.Tags
"no evidence" "passive vaping" 95% ACS addiction AHA ALA ANR ASH-UK Bates big picture biomarkers Burstyn carcinogens CDC censorship chemicals chiiiildren citations classic COI comparative risk conjunction CTFK demonic possession Dutra economics Ellen Hahn environmental vapor ERS ethics EU FCTC FDA fundamental lies gateway Glantz Gratziou gutka Hecht innumeracy Kelvin Choi Legacy logic meta-analysis motives MRTP non sequitur NRT NYTimes outsource particulates peer review policy recommendations Popova press release RCTs second-order preferences self policing Siegel statistiLie ST variants Swedish Match toxicology trANTZlator Trump parallels UAthens UBath UCSF UKY UMN US govt vapor chemistry WHO why anti-THR?Categories
- Aside (18)
- Background (19)
- Lies (224)
- Science lesson (57)
- Testimonial (3)
- truths (202)
- Uncategorized (15)
- White Paper (7)
Search Results for: particulates
Science Lesson: what are vapor, aerosol, particles, liquids, and such?
by Carl V Phillips There is much confusion about states of matter as they relate to e-cigarette “vapor”. This post is intended to explain what you need to know about them. The word “vapor” has become a generally accepted term … Continue reading
Glantz attempt at dialogue makes clear the vacuousness of his arguments
by Carl V Phillips The leading ANTZ strategy for creating the illusion that they have valid arguments, hiding the fact that they are a combination of liars and clueless, is to avoid dialogue. It is relatively easy to create the … Continue reading
What is wrong with ecig particulate claims – the simple version
by Carl V Phillips One of the two blogs (excluding this one — I will leave that judgment to others) you should read every word of, if you are interested in understanding the sciences surrounding THR, is Clive Bates’s. So … Continue reading
Letter re fatal flaws in Schober et al. paper on environmental vapor
by Carl V Phillips Below is a letter to the editor and Igor Burstyn and I will be submitting to the journal that published this article — “Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) impairs indoor air quality and increases FeNO levels of e-cigarette … Continue reading
Is heat-not-burn destined to become a serious harm reduction alternative?
by Carl V Phillips I, along with most THR advocates, have long been a bit skeptical about heat-non-burn (HnB) alternative cigarettes. These are devices that apply heat from some source (like an external burning coal or a heating element) other … Continue reading
North Dakota’s Lies Freeze Out Smokers and Former Smokers
posted by Elaine Keller On November 6, North Dakota citizens will vote on adopting a drastically revised version of the state’s anti-smoking law, “Initiated Statutory Measure No. 4 Relating to Prohibiting Smoking in Public Spaces and Worksites.” Absentee balloting has … Continue reading
