by Carl V Phillips
In case you missed it, I posted the new paper EP-ology and comments are welcome there. It is an upgrade of the report that appeared on this page a few months ago. Nothing really new, but more detail and analysis.
You can find more of my sciences lessons at Patreon
My Patreon page is here. For just $1/month you can have access to that content and be able to participate in discussions. The modest donations help support the content here too.
And thanks again to those of you who have already done this.
-
Recent Posts
- “Dependence” and the danger of adopting the language of your oppressors
- The folly of federalism for vaping (etc.) policy
- Fixed it for you – a Science Lesson based on a anti-vaping junk newspaper article
- Throwing “lifeboat ethics” thinking overboard
- Why is there anti-THR? (5) Needing an enemy and control for its own sake
Recent Comments
Follow this blog
You can subscribe using one of the usual methods. Posts will be announced in the primary author's Twitter: @carlvphillips.Tags
"no evidence" "passive vaping" 95% ACS addiction AHA ALA ANR ASH-UK Bates big picture biomarkers Burstyn carcinogens CDC censorship chemicals chiiiildren citations classic COI comparative risk conjunction CTFK demonic possession Dutra economics Ellen Hahn environmental vapor ERS ethics EU FCTC FDA fundamental lies gateway Glantz Gratziou gutka Hecht innumeracy Kelvin Choi Legacy logic meta-analysis motives MRTP non sequitur NRT NYTimes outsource particulates peer review policy recommendations Popova press release RCTs second-order preferences self policing Siegel statistiLie ST variants Swedish Match toxicology trANTZlator Trump parallels UAthens UBath UCSF UKY UMN US govt vapor chemistry WHO why anti-THR?Categories
- Aside (18)
- Background (19)
- Lies (224)
- Science lesson (57)
- Testimonial (3)
- truths (200)
- Uncategorized (15)
- White Paper (6)
